Global Climate Change Digest: Main Page | Introduction | Archives | Calendar | Copy Policy | Abbreviations | Guide to Publishers

GCRIO Home ->arrow Library ->arrowArchives of the Global Climate Change Digest ->arrow April 1989 ->arrow GENERAL INTEREST AND POLICY Search

U.S. Global Change Research Information Office logo and link to home

Last Updated:
February 28, 2007

GCRIO Program Overview



Our extensive collection of documents.


Get Acrobat Reader

Privacy Policy

Global Climate Change DigestArchives of the
Global Climate Change Digest

A Guide to Information on Greenhouse Gases and Ozone Depletion
Published July 1988 through June 1999



Item #d89apr21

"Trace Gas Emissions From Chaparral and Boreal Forest Fires," W.R. Cofer III (Atmos. Sci. Div., MS 483, NASA Langley Res. Ctr., Hampton VA 23665), J.S. Levine et al., J. Geophys. Res., 94(D2), 2255-2259, Feb. 20, 1989.

Using measurements taken at very low altitudes, authors report the mixing ratios of CO2, CO, CH4, nonmethane hydrocarbons, H2 and N2O in the atmosphere after biomass burnings at mid-latitudes. Results show emission ratios highest during smoldering combustion and during vigorous flaming combustion. Also presents for the first time emission ratios determined for C2H6, C2H4, C3H8 and C3H6.

Item #d89apr22

"A Model of Biogeochemical Cycling of Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Sulphur in the Ocean: One Step Toward a Global Climate Model," G. Shaffer (Oceanog. Inst., Univ. Gothenburg, Box 4038, S-400 40, Gothenburg, Sweden), ibid., 94(C2), 1979-2004, Feb. 15, 1989.

Develops a continuous, one-dimensional advection-diffusion model that focuses on biogeochemical cycling forced by river input of nutrients. Presents functional forms for circulation, mixing and biogeochemical processes. Derives overall constraints, defines chemical regimes, and chooses standard values for the physical, biological and geochemical parameters. Presents general solutions as well as specific solutions for the different regimes and studies the sensitivity to variations of parameters. Discusses cycling of P, N, O and S based on model output rates of the biogeochemical processes and the chemical reactions at redox boundaries. Also discusses all results with directions for future work. Provides extensive reference list.

Item #d89apr23

"Changing Composition of the Global Stratosphere," M.B. McElroy (Div. Appl. Sci., Harvard Univ., Cambridge MA 02138), R.J. Salawitch, Science, 243(4892), 763-770, Feb. 10, 1989.

Reviews current understanding of stratospheric chemistry, with particular attention to the effects of human activity. Models are in good agreement with measurements for a variety of species in the mid-latitude stratosphere, except for O3 at high altitude. Rates calculated for loss of O3 exceed rates for production by about 40% at 40 km. The rapid loss of O3 beginning in the mid-1970s at low altitudes over Antarctica in the spring is due primarily to catalytic cycles involving halogen radicals and reactions on surfaces of polar stratospheric clouds. Similar effects could occur in northern polar regions and in cold regions of the tropics. Drastic reductions in the emission of industrial halocarbons are needed to reverse damage to stratospheric O3; the Montreal Protocol should be more stringent and extended to chemicals not presently restricted.

Item #d89apr24

"The Greenhouse Effect: Science and Policy," S.H. Schneider (NCAR, POB 3000, Boulder CO 80307), ibid., 771-780.

Reviews scientific issues surrounding the greenhouse effect. Explains projections of greenhouse gas concentrations, estimations of global climatic response, projection of regional climatic responses, validation of climatic model forecasts, and scenarios of the environmental impact of CO2 increase. Reviews appropriate policy responses and considers three classes of actions: engineered countermeasures to minimize potential effects, adaptive strategies to let society adjust to environmental change, and prevention policies that could insure against the possibility of large future environmental change. Suggests tie-in strategies that provide widely agreed societal benefits even if the predicted change does not occur. Also suggests that delaying policy responses is not a scientific question but a value judgment.

Item #d89apr25

"Coping With Drought: Toward a Plan of Action," D.A. Wilhite (Intl. Drought Info. Ctr., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb.), W.E. Easterling, Eos, 97, 106-108, Feb. 14, 1989.

Following suggestions from participants to the International Symposium and Workshop on Drought, a ten-step planning process was recommended to facilitate drought preparedness through the development of contingency plans at national and provincial or state levels of government. Offers two recommendations to help develop plans: convene an international meeting to identify common elements of a model drought plan and data needed, and develop a drought-planning information network.

Item #d89apr26

"The Polar Regions: Research in a Changing World," P.E. Wilkniss (NSF Div. Polar Prog., Washington DC 20550), Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 70(2), 160-164, Feb. 1989.

Discusses changes in polar exploration and access. Observes that the Global Change/IGBP programs need an organized community to offer political and economic support to further polar research. Notes that the prediction of ozone depletion, the discovery of the Antarctic ozone hole, and the first description of the hole's detailed structure were the result of the creativity and perseverance of individual scientists.

Item #d89apr27

"Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment," V. Ramanathan (Dept. Geophys. Sci., Univ. Chicago, Chicago IL 60637), Science, 243(4887), 57-63, Jan. 6, 1989.

Presents quantitative estimates of the global distributions of shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) forcing from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE). Develops the cloud-radiative forcing concept, and describes global variations in the forcing on the basis of the ERBE data. Notes the SW and LW components of cloud forcing are about ten times as large as the expected value of radiative forcing from a doubling of CO2. Shows that small changes in the cloud-radiative forcing fields can play a significant role as a climate feedback mechanism.

Item #d89apr28

"Greenhouse Warming: Comparative Analysis of Nuclear and Efficiency Abatement Strategies," B. Keepin (Rocky Mtn. Inst., 1739 Snowmass Creek Rd., Snowmass CO 81654), B. Kats, Energy Policy, 16(6), 538-561, Dec. 1988.

Compares the feasibility, relative cost and effectiveness of the two strategies. Principal findings are: even a massive worldwide nuclear power program sustained over several decades could not solve the greenhouse problem; improving efficiency of energy usage is the key to reducing climatic warming caused by combustion of fossil fuels and improving electrical efficiency is nearly seven times more cost-effective than nuclear power for abating CO2 emissions in the U.S. Reviews historical experience of nuclear power, focusing on developing countries. Provides an appendix with details of calculations and analyses used in the text. Extensive reference list.

Item #d89apr29

"Traffic and the Greenhouse Effect," R. Swart (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezonheid en Milieuhygiene, Bilthoven, Neth.), Lucht Omgev., 5(4), 126-129, Dec. 1988. In Dutch.

Estimates of future emissions of CO and hydrocarbons have been made based on scenarios for car ownership and technological development. Major uncertainties are caused by the rather unpredictable development of private car ownership in highly populated third world countries. Suggests that CO2, CO, NO2 and hydrocarbon emissions can be limited by increasing fuel efficiency and additional technical measures, a fuel switch, or limitation of car ownership and car use.

  • Guide to Publishers
  • Index of Abbreviations

  • Hosted by U.S. Global Change Research Information Office. Copyright by Center for Environmental Information, Inc. For more information contact U.S. Global Change Research Information Office, Suite 250, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: +1 202 223 6262. Fax: +1 202 223 3065. Email: Web: Webmaster:
    U.S. Climate Change Technology Program Intranet Logo and link to Home