Global Climate Change Digest: Main Page | Introduction | Archives | Calendar | Copy Policy | Abbreviations | Guide to Publishers

GCRIO Home ->arrow Library ->arrow Archives of the Global Climate Change Digest ->arrow March 1991 ->arrow GENERAL INTEREST AND POLICY Search

U.S. Global Change Research Information Office logo and link to home

Last Updated:
February 28, 2007

GCRIO Program Overview



Our extensive collection of documents.


Get Acrobat Reader

Privacy Policy

Global Climate Change DigestArchives of the
Global Climate Change Digest

A Guide to Information on Greenhouse Gases and Ozone Depletion
Published July 1988 through June 1999



Item #d91mar1

"How to Slow Global Warming," D.G. Victor (Dept. Political Sci., MIT, Cambridge MA 02139), Nature, 349(6309), 451-456, Feb. 7, 1991.

To structure an effective climate agreement that gains wide acceptance by nations and is flexible enough to accommodate new scientific findings and political interests, suggests an open-ended agreement modeled on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. A General Agreement on Climate Change (GACC) would differ from the convention-protocol approach (the most popular structure under consideration now) in that it would not specify the types of issue linkages in its structure; it would begin modestly and evolve over time. Some issues would remain from round to round, while others would appear or disappear as necessary. This approach is in between the issue-by-issue structure of the convention-protocol approach and the comprehensive structure of a Law of the Atmosphere.

Item #d91mar2

"Evidence from Balloon Measurements for Chemical Depletion of Stratospheric Ozone in the Arctic Winter of 1989-90," D.J. Hoffmann (Dept. Phys., Univ. Wyoming, Laramie WY 82071), T. Deshler, ibid., 349(6307), 300-305, Jan. 24, 1991.

Ozone minima repeatedly observed in the 22-km region were negatively correlated with the time air parcels spent in regions cold enough for the formation of polar stratospheric clouds. This fact and the presence of sunlight on a portion of each air-parcel trajectory suggest these minima are related to chemical ozone depletion. (A related comment by M. Chipperfield appears on pp. 279-280 of this issue.)

Item #d91mar3

"Low-Cost Strategies for Coping with CO2 Emission Limits," R.H. Williams (Ctr. Energy Environ. Stud., Princeton Univ., Princeton NJ 08544), The Energy J., 11(3), 35-59, 1990.

This critique of a paper by Manne and Richels (next entry) shows that the options for reducing CO2 emissions through energy demand reduction and energy supply shifts are much broader than those they considered. A much more broadly-based energy R&D program is needed.

Item #d91mar4

"CO2 Emission Limits: An Economic Cost Analysis for the USA," A. Manne (Elec. Power Res. Inst., POB 50490, Palo Alto CA 94303), R. Richels, The Energy J., 11(2), 51-74, 1990.

Describes a modeling framework for evaluating the potential economic impacts of alternative strategies for coping with greenhouse warming. Estimates that the discounted present value of economic consumption losses arising from a 20% reduction in CO2 emissions through the next century could be reduced from $3.6 trillion to $0.8 trillion by achieving high levels of energy efficiency improvement beyond what the energy price mechanism alone would induce, and by commercializing low-cost, low-CO2-emitting supply technologies. A vigorous R&D program should be started before scientific uncertainties on global warming are settled.

Item #d91mar5

"Innovations in International Environmental Governance," P.H. Sand (U.N. Econ. Comm. for Europe, Geneva, Switz.), Environment, 32(9), 17-20, 40-43, Nov. 1990.

Based on a study prepared for the World Resources Institute, this article discusses recent successful international environmental agreements such as the Montreal Protocol. One important characteristic is their fluid nature, which allows quick response to growing scientific understanding.

Item #d91mar6

"Report on Reports," J.K. Sebenius (Kennedy Sch. Govt., Harvard Univ., 79 JFK St., Cambridge MA 02138), ibid., 25-30.

An extensive review and discussion of The Greenhouse Effect: Negotiating Targets by M. Grubb (Reports/General and Policy, Global Climate Change Digest, Mar. 1990), which advocates an international system of marketable carbon-emission permits. Concludes that the paper is a fine piece of work which considerably advances the debate over climate negotiations, and forms a solid platform for further progress.

Item #d91mar7

"Debt for Nature Swaps and the Need for Alternatives," A. Patterson (Tufts Univ., Medford Mass.), ibid., 32(10), 5-13, 31-32, Dec. 1990.

Four types of restrictions limit the effectiveness of debt-for-nature swaps: the kinds of players that can be involved, the types of projects funded, effects on the economy, and sovereignty issues. Proposes three classes of alternatives: those suitable for commercial debt, those applicable to bi- and multilateral debt, and those concerning "Brady Plan" debt renegotiations.

Item #d91mar8

"Debt-for-Nature Swaps: A New Strategy for Protecting Environmental Interests in Developing Nations," T.B. Hamlin, Ecol. Law Quart., 16, 1065-1088, 1989.

Analyzes four recent swaps negotiated by two U.S.-based environmental organizations with the governments of Bolivia, Ecuador, Costa Rica and the Philippines. Concludes that swaps are an appealing small-scale means for private organizations to protect environmental interests abroad; their nominal impact on the debt problem is not an indication of failure.

Item #d91mar9

"Heat Pollution and Global Warming," G. Fischer (Dept. Chem., Australian Nat. Univ., Canberra 2601, Aust.), Environ. Conserv., 17(2), 117-122, Summer 1990.

An assessment of the major anthropogenic sources of heat pollution and the ultimate heat generated. Heat pollution may be relatively more important than greenhouse warming because it is a direct process producing heat at the surface of the globe and not subject to moderating feedback mechanisms. Heat pollution will increase any overall warming from increasing CO2 and add to the global problems that may stem from it.

  • Guide to Publishers
  • Index of Abbreviations

  • Hosted by U.S. Global Change Research Information Office. Copyright by Center for Environmental Information, Inc. For more information contact U.S. Global Change Research Information Office, Suite 250, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: +1 202 223 6262. Fax: +1 202 223 3065. Email: Web: Webmaster:
    U.S. Climate Change Technology Program Intranet Logo and link to Home