Last Updated: February 28, 2007
GCRIO Program Overview
Library Our extensive collection of documents.

Privacy Policy |
Archives of the
Global Climate Change Digest A Guide to Information on Greenhouse Gases and Ozone Depletion Published July 1988 through June 1999
FROM VOLUME 6, NUMBER 7-8, JULY-AUGUST 1993
NEWS...
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
Item #d93jul70
The United Kingdom remains
the major roadblock to acceptance of the E.C. carbon/energy tax, and
lack of progress on the tax now appears to be hindering E.C. acceptance of the
U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. At a June 28 meeting of E.C.
environment ministers, The Netherlands and Germany insisted it would be wrong to
ratify the convention since the tax is necessary for meeting the E.C. commitment
for CO2 reduction: stabilizing CO2 emissions at 1990
levels by the year 2000. (See Global Environ. Change Rep., p. 3, July 9
1993, and feature report in Energy, Econ. & Clim. Change, pp. 2-4,
June 1993.) The E.C. Environment Commissioner will produce, by the end of
September, a study on how E.C. member states are sharing the burden of CO2
stabilization (Intl. Environ. Rptr., p. 465, June 30). The study is
intended to help convince the U.K. that the tax is necessary.
The E.C. recently adopted two energy programs it says will help reach the CO2
stabilization goal-SAVE (energy efficiency standards), and ALTENER (development
of renewable energy sources). However, the European Association for the
Conservation of Energy argues that the Save program was severely watered down
from its original form, and is unlikely to contribute much to CO2
control. (See ibid., pp. 470-471; New Scientist, p. 11, July 3
1993)
Guide to Publishers
Index of Abbreviations
|