Last Updated: February 28, 2007
GCRIO Program Overview
Library Our extensive collection of documents.

Privacy Policy |
Archives of the
Global Climate Change Digest A Guide to Information on Greenhouse Gases and Ozone Depletion Published July 1988 through June 1999
FROM VOLUME 6, NUMBER 5, MAY 1993
NEWS...
INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS
Item #d93may93
At the seventh meeting of the
Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) held in New York City in March
(the first since the Clinton Administration took office), U.S. representative
Madeleine Albright announced that the Administration will conduct a
comprehensive review of U.S. policy on climate change. It intends to determine
whether the U.S. can at least stabilize its greenhouse gas emissions by the year
2000, and to complete a revised national action plan before the next INC meeting
in August. While the statement clearly signals a change in attitude from that of
the Bush Administration, the use of the term "greenhouse emissions"
rather than "carbon emissions" suggests that President Clinton may
have backed off his campaign promise to stabilize CO2 emissions by the year 2000
(Global Environ. Change Rep., p. 4, Mar. 26). In an account of the INC
meeting in its new monthly bulletin Climate Watch, the Global Climate
Coalition (1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, S. 1500 N. Tower, Washington DC 20004;
202-637-3158), which represents industry, discusses its support for the policy
review, emphasizing the need to examine the various economic consequences of
proposed actions.
The main topic of the INC meeting was a set of proposals from the "Group
of 77" developing countries regarding the Global Environment Facility
(GEF). Developing countries favor an arrangement which gives them a voice in the
funding mechanisms intended to help them attain the goals of the climate
convention, and favor a structure resembling the Montreal Protocol Multilateral
Fund. Little progress was made on this and related topics, and discussions will
continue in working group meetings and at the next INC meeting in August. (See
meeting accounts in the Mar. 24 Intl. Environ. Rptr., pp. 195-196 and
198, and an article (pp. 233-237) by D.M. Goldberg of the Center for
International Environmental Law (Washington, D.C.), which discusses the Montreal
Protocol Multilateral Fund as a model for climate convention funding.
At an international meeting on climate research, held in April in Geneva
under U.N. sponsorship, 53 countries pledged to improve climate research
programs and reporting techniques, particularly in developing countries. The aim
of the conference was to improve the ability to predict climate. A meeting
account in ibid. (pp. 282-283, Apr. 21) again brings up the debate over
funding mechanisms, which will be crucial to developing countries attempting to
improve their climate services.
Guide to Publishers
Index of Abbreviations
|